Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3939
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLal, A M N-
dc.contributor.authorKrishnamurthy, S-
dc.contributor.authorGirinandagopal, M S-
dc.contributor.authorKothakota, A-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, R-
dc.contributor.authorVenugopalan, V V-
dc.contributor.authorIshwarya, S P-
dc.contributor.authorVenkatesh, T-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T05:55:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T05:55:39Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-
dc.identifier.citationLWT-Food Science and Technology;154:112749en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112749-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3939-
dc.description.abstractThe present study aims at establishing the resourcefulness of a low-temperature/low-humidity dryer, namely, Refrigeration Adsorption Dehumidified Dryer (RADD) for the drying of carrots, vis-à-vis a fluidized bed dryer (FBD). Notably the RADD is a customized design developed by the Agro-Processing and Technology Division of CSIR-NIIST, India. The differently dried carrot samples were compared for the drying rate, rehydration ratio, shrinkage kinetics and physicochemical quality characteristics such as moisture content, morphology, color and sensory attributes. The moisture content of carrot was reduced from an initial value of 80 g moisture/100 g of sample to 10 g moisture/100 g of sample (wet basis). Though the drying rate was higher in FBD than RADD, the percentage removal of moisture content was higher in the latter due to the synergistic effect of heating and dehumidification of drying air. Similarly, rehydration of RADD-dried carrots was slower (4 h) than their FBD counterparts (3 h). But, within the aforementioned duration, RADD-dried carrots achieved ∼96% of rehydration weight attained by the FBD-dried carrots. The total phenolic and flavonoid contents and amount of β-carotene retained in dried carrot samples were higher after RADD. The color parameters of dried samples were not significantly different between the two drying techniques.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectdehumidifying dryingen_US
dc.subjectfluidized bed dryingen_US
dc.subjectdrying rateen_US
dc.subjectbeta-caroteneen_US
dc.subjectphenolic and flavonoid contentsen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of the Refrigerated Adsorption Drying of Daucus Carota with Fluidized Bed Dryingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2022



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.