Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/717
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFazil Marickar, Y M-
dc.contributor.authorLekshmi, P R-
dc.contributor.authorLuxmi Varma, R-
dc.contributor.authorPeter Koshy-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-11T10:27:11Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-11T10:27:11Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationUrological Research 37(5):271-276;Oct 2009en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5623-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.niist.res.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/717-
dc.description.abstractMixed stones form a significant number of all urinary stones. Accurate analysis of individual areas of stones is fraught with uncertainties. Scanning electron microscopy with elemental distribution analysis (SEM-EDAX) is a very important tool in assessing stone composition. The objective of this paper is to project the role of the combination of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and SEM-EDAX combination in achieving a total understanding of mixed stone morphology. Ten mixed urinary stones were washed and dried and the composition recognized by analysis of FTIR spectra by comparing with the spectra of pure components. Spectra for different layers were obtained. Then the stone samples were further studied by SEM-EDAX analysis. The findings of FTIR were correlated with SEM-EDAX and detailed data generated. Using SEM-EDAX, the spatial distribution of major and trace elements were studied to understand their initiation and formation. As much as 80% of the stones studied were mixtures of calcium oxalate monohydrate (whewellite) and calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite) in various proportions. Quantitative evaluation of components was achieved through FTIR and SEM-EDAX analysis. It was possible to get an idea about the spatial distribution of molecules using SEM analysis. The composition of different areas was identified using EDAX. Analyzing with EDAX, it was possible to obtain the percentage of different elements present in a single sample. The study concludes that the most common mixed stone encountered in the study is a mixture of calcium oxalate monohydrate and calcium phosphate in a definite proportion. The combination identified not only the molecular species present in the calculus, but also the crystalline forms within chemical constituents. Using EDAX, the amount of calcium, phosphorus, oxygen and carbon present in the stone sample could be well understood.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectSpectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectMicroprobeen_US
dc.subjectUrinary calculien_US
dc.subjectPhosphateen_US
dc.subjectSEMen_US
dc.subjectUrinary stoneen_US
dc.subjectEDAXen_US
dc.subjectFTIRen_US
dc.titleEDAX versus FTIR in mixed stonesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2009 _ 00022.pdf
  Restricted Access
315.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.