Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/720
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFazil Marickar, Y M-
dc.contributor.authorLekshmi, P R-
dc.contributor.authorLuxmi Varma, R-
dc.contributor.authorPeter Koshy-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-11T10:54:09Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-11T10:54:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationUrological Research 37(5):277-282;Oct 2009en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5623-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.niist.res.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/720-
dc.description.abstractVarious crystals are seen in human urine. Some of them, particularly calcium oxalate dihydrate, are seen normally. Pathological crystals indicate crystal formation initiating urinary stones. Unfortunately, many of the relevant crystals are not recognized in light microscopic analysis of the urinary deposit performed in most of the clinical laboratories. Many crystals are not clearly identifiable under the ordinary light microscopy. The objective of the present study was to perform scanning electron microscopic (SEM) assessment of various urinary deposits and confirm the identity by elemental distribution analysis (EDAX). 50 samples of urinary deposits were collected from urinary stone clinic. Deposits containing significant crystalluria (more than 10 per HPF) were collected under liquid paraffin in special containers and taken up for SEM studies. The deposited crystals were retrieved with appropriate Pasteur pipettes, and placed on micropore filter paper discs. The fluid was absorbed by thicker layers of filter paper underneath and discs were fixed to brass studs. They were then gold sputtered to 100 and examined under SEM (Jeol JSM 35C microscope). When crystals were seen, their morphology was recorded by taking photographs at different angles. At appropriate magnification, EDAX probe was pointed to the crystals under study and the wave patterns analyzed. Components of the crystals were recognized by utilizing the data. All the samples analyzed contained significant number of crystals. All samples contained more than one type of crystal. The commonest crystals encountered included calcium oxalate monohydrate (whewellite 22%), calcium oxalate dihydrate (weddellite 32%), uric acid (10%), calcium phosphates, namely, apatite (4%), brushite (6%), struvite (6%) and octocalcium phosphate (2%). The morphological appearances of urinary crystals described were correlated with the wavelengths obtained through elemental distribution analysis. Various urinary crystals that are not reported under light microscopy could be recognized by SEM-EDAX combination. EDAX is a significant tool for recognizing unknown crystals not identified by ordinary light microscopy or SEM alone.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopyen_US
dc.subjectEDAXen_US
dc.subjectWhewelliteen_US
dc.subjectWeddelliteen_US
dc.subjectUric aciden_US
dc.subjectStruviteen_US
dc.subjectBrushiteen_US
dc.titleElemental distribution analysis of urinary crystalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2009 _ 00023.pdf
  Restricted Access
443.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.