Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/745
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFazil Marickar, Y M-
dc.contributor.authorLekshmi, P R-
dc.contributor.authorLuxmi Varma, R-
dc.contributor.authorPeter Koshy-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-13T09:39:27Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-13T09:39:27Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationUrological Research 37(5):293-297;Oct 2009en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5623-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.niist.res.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/745-
dc.description.abstractStone analysis is incompletely done in many clinical centers. Identification of the stone component is essential for deciding future prophylaxis. X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) still remains a distant dream for routine hospital work. It is in this context that optical microscopy is suggested as an alternate procedure. The objective of this article was to assess the utility of an optical microscope which gives magnification of up to 40x and gives clear picture of the surface of the stones. In order to authenticate the morphological analysis of urinary stones, SEM and elemental distribution analysis were performed. A total of 250 urinary stones of different compositions were collected from stone clinic, photographed, observed under an optical microscope, and optical photographs were taken at different angles. Twenty-five representative samples among these were gold sputtered to make them conductive and were fed into the SEM machine. Photographs of the samples were taken at different angles at magnifications up to 4,000. Elemental distribution analysis (EDAX) was done to confirm the composition. The observations of the two studies were compared. The different appearances of the stones under optical illuminated microscopy were mostly standardized appearances, namely bosselations of pure whewellite, spiculations of weddellite, bright yellow colored appearance of uric acid, and dirty white amorphous appearance of phosphates. SEM and EDAX gave clearer pictures and gave added confirmation of the stone composition. From the references thus obtained, it was possible to confirm the composition by studying the optical microscopic pictures. Higher magnification capacity of the SEM and the EDAX patterns are useful to give reference support for performing optical microscopy work. After standardization, routine analysis can be performed with optical microscopy. The advantage of the optical microscope is that, it is easy to use and samples can be analyzed in natural color.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectOptical microscopyen_US
dc.subjectElectron microscopyen_US
dc.subjectUric aciden_US
dc.subjectUrinary stoneen_US
dc.subjectWhewelliteen_US
dc.subjectSpectroscopyen_US
dc.titleOptical microscopy versus scanning electron microscopy in urolithiasisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2009 _ 00025.pdf
  Restricted Access
352.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.