DSpace Repository

A Comparison of the Refrigerated Adsorption Drying of Daucus Carota with Fluidized Bed Drying

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lal, A M N
dc.contributor.author Krishnamurthy, S
dc.contributor.author Girinandagopal, M S
dc.contributor.author Kothakota, A
dc.contributor.author Kumar, R
dc.contributor.author Venugopalan, V V
dc.contributor.author Ishwarya, S P
dc.contributor.author Venkatesh, T
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-25T05:55:39Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-25T05:55:39Z
dc.date.issued 2022-01
dc.identifier.citation LWT-Food Science and Technology;154:112749 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112749
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3939
dc.description.abstract The present study aims at establishing the resourcefulness of a low-temperature/low-humidity dryer, namely, Refrigeration Adsorption Dehumidified Dryer (RADD) for the drying of carrots, vis-à-vis a fluidized bed dryer (FBD). Notably the RADD is a customized design developed by the Agro-Processing and Technology Division of CSIR-NIIST, India. The differently dried carrot samples were compared for the drying rate, rehydration ratio, shrinkage kinetics and physicochemical quality characteristics such as moisture content, morphology, color and sensory attributes. The moisture content of carrot was reduced from an initial value of 80 g moisture/100 g of sample to 10 g moisture/100 g of sample (wet basis). Though the drying rate was higher in FBD than RADD, the percentage removal of moisture content was higher in the latter due to the synergistic effect of heating and dehumidification of drying air. Similarly, rehydration of RADD-dried carrots was slower (4 h) than their FBD counterparts (3 h). But, within the aforementioned duration, RADD-dried carrots achieved ∼96% of rehydration weight attained by the FBD-dried carrots. The total phenolic and flavonoid contents and amount of β-carotene retained in dried carrot samples were higher after RADD. The color parameters of dried samples were not significantly different between the two drying techniques. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject dehumidifying drying en_US
dc.subject fluidized bed drying en_US
dc.subject drying rate en_US
dc.subject beta-carotene en_US
dc.subject phenolic and flavonoid contents en_US
dc.title A Comparison of the Refrigerated Adsorption Drying of Daucus Carota with Fluidized Bed Drying en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • 2022
    Research articles authored by NIIST researchers published in 2022

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account