DSpace Repository

EDAX versus FTIR in mixed stones

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fazil Marickar, Y M
dc.contributor.author Lekshmi, P R
dc.contributor.author Luxmi Varma, R
dc.contributor.author Peter Koshy
dc.date.accessioned 2013-11-11T10:27:11Z
dc.date.available 2013-11-11T10:27:11Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation Urological Research 37(5):271-276;Oct 2009 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0300-5623
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.niist.res.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/717
dc.description.abstract Mixed stones form a significant number of all urinary stones. Accurate analysis of individual areas of stones is fraught with uncertainties. Scanning electron microscopy with elemental distribution analysis (SEM-EDAX) is a very important tool in assessing stone composition. The objective of this paper is to project the role of the combination of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and SEM-EDAX combination in achieving a total understanding of mixed stone morphology. Ten mixed urinary stones were washed and dried and the composition recognized by analysis of FTIR spectra by comparing with the spectra of pure components. Spectra for different layers were obtained. Then the stone samples were further studied by SEM-EDAX analysis. The findings of FTIR were correlated with SEM-EDAX and detailed data generated. Using SEM-EDAX, the spatial distribution of major and trace elements were studied to understand their initiation and formation. As much as 80% of the stones studied were mixtures of calcium oxalate monohydrate (whewellite) and calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite) in various proportions. Quantitative evaluation of components was achieved through FTIR and SEM-EDAX analysis. It was possible to get an idea about the spatial distribution of molecules using SEM analysis. The composition of different areas was identified using EDAX. Analyzing with EDAX, it was possible to obtain the percentage of different elements present in a single sample. The study concludes that the most common mixed stone encountered in the study is a mixture of calcium oxalate monohydrate and calcium phosphate in a definite proportion. The combination identified not only the molecular species present in the calculus, but also the crystalline forms within chemical constituents. Using EDAX, the amount of calcium, phosphorus, oxygen and carbon present in the stone sample could be well understood. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.subject Spectroscopy en_US
dc.subject Microprobe en_US
dc.subject Urinary calculi en_US
dc.subject Phosphate en_US
dc.subject SEM en_US
dc.subject Urinary stone en_US
dc.subject EDAX en_US
dc.subject FTIR en_US
dc.title EDAX versus FTIR in mixed stones en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • 2009
    2009 Publications

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account