DSpace Repository

Optical microscopy versus scanning electron microscopy in urolithiasis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fazil Marickar, Y M
dc.contributor.author Lekshmi, P R
dc.contributor.author Luxmi Varma, R
dc.contributor.author Peter Koshy
dc.date.accessioned 2013-11-13T09:39:27Z
dc.date.available 2013-11-13T09:39:27Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation Urological Research 37(5):293-297;Oct 2009 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0300-5623
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.niist.res.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/745
dc.description.abstract Stone analysis is incompletely done in many clinical centers. Identification of the stone component is essential for deciding future prophylaxis. X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) still remains a distant dream for routine hospital work. It is in this context that optical microscopy is suggested as an alternate procedure. The objective of this article was to assess the utility of an optical microscope which gives magnification of up to 40x and gives clear picture of the surface of the stones. In order to authenticate the morphological analysis of urinary stones, SEM and elemental distribution analysis were performed. A total of 250 urinary stones of different compositions were collected from stone clinic, photographed, observed under an optical microscope, and optical photographs were taken at different angles. Twenty-five representative samples among these were gold sputtered to make them conductive and were fed into the SEM machine. Photographs of the samples were taken at different angles at magnifications up to 4,000. Elemental distribution analysis (EDAX) was done to confirm the composition. The observations of the two studies were compared. The different appearances of the stones under optical illuminated microscopy were mostly standardized appearances, namely bosselations of pure whewellite, spiculations of weddellite, bright yellow colored appearance of uric acid, and dirty white amorphous appearance of phosphates. SEM and EDAX gave clearer pictures and gave added confirmation of the stone composition. From the references thus obtained, it was possible to confirm the composition by studying the optical microscopic pictures. Higher magnification capacity of the SEM and the EDAX patterns are useful to give reference support for performing optical microscopy work. After standardization, routine analysis can be performed with optical microscopy. The advantage of the optical microscope is that, it is easy to use and samples can be analyzed in natural color. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.subject Optical microscopy en_US
dc.subject Electron microscopy en_US
dc.subject Uric acid en_US
dc.subject Urinary stone en_US
dc.subject Whewellite en_US
dc.subject Spectroscopy en_US
dc.title Optical microscopy versus scanning electron microscopy in urolithiasis en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • 2009
    2009 Publications

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account